Julia Shillingford appeared in the Supreme Court in the case of Birch v Birch UKSC20015/0230


23rd May 2017 | News


Julia has acted for the Respondent husband in all proceedings since 2010. The case considers what are the correct principles to be applied when varying/setting aside the terms of a final consent order in matrimonial finance proceedings. Should the Court apply s.31 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, in this case to an undertaking, or is it constrained by Court of Appeal authority to apply a narrower approach, for example a significant change of circumstances. Julia was led in the Supreme Court by John Wilson QC of 1 Hare Court Chambers.

The judgment can be found here.


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Recent

Harcourt Chambers at the Berks, Bucks, and Oxon Resolution Family Law Day

It was a pleasure to have representation from Harcourt Chambers at the Berks, Bucks and…


Rob George Shortlisted for Junior Bar Pro Bono Award: A Commitment to Justice

In the legal arena, recognition is often reserved for those who go above and beyond…


Natasha Miller talks to For Legal about Barring Orders in Family Law (Domestic Abuse)

Natasha Miller talks to For Legal in this webinar Barring Orders in Family Law (Domestic…

Search

Shortlist close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download