John Vater QC in Re E concerning parental responsibility and artificial reproduction


4th Feb 2015 | News


John Vater QC appeared for the father in this case involving home donation of sperm. The mother was a homosexual woman and had met the father on a website called coparentmatch.com. A child was born to the parties in 2010. Contact agreements broke down after the father began to present himself and the mother as though they were in a heterosexual relationship.

The father applied for contact and a parental responsibility order.

Hayden J made important observations about parental responsibility in artificial reproduction cases. He concluded his judgment with a plea for the word ‘donor’ to be expunged from the ‘lexicon of family law.’


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Author

Recent

Edward Bennett and Rob George appear in the Supreme Court In the matter of T (A Child) [2021] UKSC 35

On Friday, 30 July 2021 the Supreme Court decision in T (A Child) [2021] UKSC 35 was published. This case concerns the...

Harcourt Chambers is delighted to welcome Alana Hughes and Adam Kayani

Chambers is delighted to announce that Alana Hughes and Adam Kayani have accepted invitations to join Chambers upon...

Dr Rob George promoted to Professor of Law and Policy at UCL

Chambers is delighted to announce that Dr Rob George has been promoted to Professor of Law and Policy at UCL. The...

Search