John Vater QC in Re E concerning parental responsibility and artificial reproduction


4th Feb 2015 | News


John Vater QC appeared for the father in this case involving home donation of sperm. The mother was a homosexual woman and had met the father on a website called coparentmatch.com. A child was born to the parties in 2010. Contact agreements broke down after the father began to present himself and the mother as though they were in a heterosexual relationship.

The father applied for contact and a parental responsibility order.

Hayden J made important observations about parental responsibility in artificial reproduction cases. He concluded his judgment with a plea for the word ‘donor’ to be expunged from the ‘lexicon of family law.’


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Author

Recent

We are delighted to announce that Ruth Cabeza has joined Chambers

Ruth is a family law specialist with extensive knowledge and experience across all fields of family law. Ruth has been...

Martha Gray in the High Court in Prospective Adopters v A County Council [2021] EWHC 91 (Fam)

This case concerned the extent of any legal obligation under the Vienna Convention to notify foreign consular...

Edward Devereux QC, Mehvish Chaudhry and Paige Campbell have appeared in the UK Supreme Court in the case of G v G

Edward Devereux QC has appeared in the UK Supreme Court on 25, 26 and 27 January 2021 in the case of G v G leading...

Search