John Vater QC in Re E concerning parental responsibility and artificial reproduction


4th Feb 2015 | News


John Vater QC appeared for the father in this case involving home donation of sperm. The mother was a homosexual woman and had met the father on a website called coparentmatch.com. A child was born to the parties in 2010. Contact agreements broke down after the father began to present himself and the mother as though they were in a heterosexual relationship.

The father applied for contact and a parental responsibility order.

Hayden J made important observations about parental responsibility in artificial reproduction cases. He concluded his judgment with a plea for the word ‘donor’ to be expunged from the ‘lexicon of family law.’


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Author

Recent

The test to discharge a special guardianship order (Re M (special guardianship order—leave to apply to discharge))

Ruth Cabeza considers the Court of Appeal’s clarification of the test for an application for leave to apply to...

We are delighted to announce that Anna Yarde has returned from maternity leave

We are delighted to welcome Anna back from maternity leave who is once more focused on her busy practice. Anna...

Mehvish Chaudhry co-authors article which explores the 1980 Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and British Overseas Territories

Mehvish Chaudhry has co-authored an article alongside James Netto, Partner at The International Family Law Group, which...

Search