Cecilia Barrett in Re B (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 974


23rd Sep 2015 | News


The Judge at first instance heard submissions and considered a section 47 report prepared by social workers, along with a letter from the child’s school. The Judge made an order that in the interim the child should return to live with the Mother pending a full investigation of the issues.

On appeal the Father argued that the Judge’s decision had been premature. The Court of Appeal rejected that submission, concluding that it was a matter of discretion for the Judge.  The Court reiterated guidance in respect of short term interim decisions made in private law cases; it must be “extremely plain” that the first instance Judge was in error before a higher court will interfere with an interim child arrangements order.


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Author

Recent

Alison Williams is set to become a part time lecturer at the University of Law

Congratulations to Alison Williams who has been offered a part time position as a Visiting Lecturer at the University...

The Court of Appeal has handed down it’s decision in G (A Child)

The Court of Appeal has handed down it’s decision in G (A Child), a groundbreaking decision concerning the...

Harcourt Chambers is delighted to announce that it has been shortlisted for “Family Law Set of the Year – London”

Harcourt Chambers is delighted to announce that it has been shortlisted for "Family Law Set of the Year - London" at...

Search