Cecilia Barrett in Re B (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 974

23rd Sep 2015 | News

The Judge at first instance heard submissions and considered a section 47 report prepared by social workers, along with a letter from the child’s school. The Judge made an order that in the interim the child should return to live with the Mother pending a full investigation of the issues.

On appeal the Father argued that the Judge’s decision had been premature. The Court of Appeal rejected that submission, concluding that it was a matter of discretion for the Judge.  The Court reiterated guidance in respect of short term interim decisions made in private law cases; it must be “extremely plain” that the first instance Judge was in error before a higher court will interfere with an interim child arrangements order.

Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.



International Movement of Children Webinar

Edward Devereux QC, Mehvish Chaudhry and Paige Campbell will be speaking at the International Movement of Children...

David Marusza and Jason Green to give a Financial Remedy Update seminar to YRES Oxford

David Marusza and Jason Green will be giving a Financial Remedy Update to Resolution and YRes members at 5.45pm on 9...

The test to discharge a special guardianship order (Re M (special guardianship order—leave to apply to discharge))

Ruth Cabeza considers the Court of Appeal’s clarification of the test for an application for leave to apply to...