Cecilia Barrett in Re B (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 974


23rd Sep 2015 | News


The Judge at first instance heard submissions and considered a section 47 report prepared by social workers, along with a letter from the child’s school. The Judge made an order that in the interim the child should return to live with the Mother pending a full investigation of the issues.

On appeal the Father argued that the Judge’s decision had been premature. The Court of Appeal rejected that submission, concluding that it was a matter of discretion for the Judge.  The Court reiterated guidance in respect of short term interim decisions made in private law cases; it must be “extremely plain” that the first instance Judge was in error before a higher court will interfere with an interim child arrangements order.


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Author

Recent

Harcourt Chambers joins the 10,000 Black Interns initiative

Harcourt Chambers is proud to have signed up as part of the Bar’s collective participation to the 10,000 Black...

Harcourt Chambers shortlisted for the Family Law Awards 2021

We are delighted to announce that Harcourt Chambers and two of our members have been shortlisted for awards at this...

Mehvish Chaudhry shortlisted as Family Junior of the Year

Harcourt Chambers is delighted to announce that Mehvish Chaudhry has been shortlisted as Family Junior of the...

Search