Julia Shillingford appeared in the Supreme Court in the case of Birch v Birch UKSC20015/0230


23rd May 2017 | News


Julia has acted for the Respondent husband in all proceedings since 2010. The case considers what are the correct principles to be applied when varying/setting aside the terms of a final consent order in matrimonial finance proceedings. Should the court apply s.31 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, in this case to an undertaking, or is it constrained by Court of Appeal authority to apply a narrower approach, for example a significant change of circumstances. Julia was led in the Supreme Court by John Wilson QC of 1 Hare Court Chambers.

The judgment can be found here.


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Recent

Alison Williams is set to become a part time lecturer at the University of Law

Congratulations to Alison Williams who has been offered a part time position as a Visiting Lecturer at the University...

The Court of Appeal has handed down it’s decision in G (A Child)

The Court of Appeal has handed down it’s decision in G (A Child), a groundbreaking decision concerning the...

Harcourt Chambers is delighted to announce that it has been shortlisted for “Family Law Set of the Year – London”

Harcourt Chambers is delighted to announce that it has been shortlisted for "Family Law Set of the Year - London" at...

Search