Julia Shillingford appeared in the Supreme Court in the case of Birch v Birch UKSC20015/0230


23rd May 2017 | News


Julia has acted for the Respondent husband in all proceedings since 2010. The case considers what are the correct principles to be applied when varying/setting aside the terms of a final consent order in matrimonial finance proceedings. Should the Court apply s.31 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, in this case to an undertaking, or is it constrained by Court of Appeal authority to apply a narrower approach, for example a significant change of circumstances. Julia was led in the Supreme Court by John Wilson QC of 1 Hare Court Chambers.

The judgment can be found here.


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice, talk about a similar matter, call our clerks on 020 7353 6961.

Recent

Nick Goodwin KC in A Council v An NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2024] EWHC 874 (Fam) 

Nick Goodwin KC was instructed by the Applicant local authority in A Council v An NHS…


Barristers from Harcourt Chambers attend Briefed’s Leadership and Wellbeing Conference

Harcourt Chambers, known for its commitment to excellence and wellbeing within the legal profession, was…


Exploring Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Night of Insight and Networking

Last night, Chambers and Middle Temple were abuzz as four very knowledgeable speakers delved into…

Search

Shortlist close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download