Julia Shillingford appeared in the Supreme Court in the case of Birch v Birch UKSC20015/0230


23rd May 2017 | News


Julia has acted for the Respondent husband in all proceedings since 2010. The case considers what are the correct principles to be applied when varying/setting aside the terms of a final consent order in matrimonial finance proceedings. Should the Court apply s.31 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, in this case to an undertaking, or is it constrained by Court of Appeal authority to apply a narrower approach, for example a significant change of circumstances. Julia was led in the Supreme Court by John Wilson QC of 1 Hare Court Chambers.

The judgment can be found here.


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice or to talk to one of our clerks about a matter then please call on 02073536961.

Recent

Aidan Vine KC in H v O (Fact-Finding) [2026] EWHC 715 (Fam) 

Aidan Vine KC, instructed by Stephensons Solicitors for the Respondent mother, led Naima Asif of Pump…


Daniel Sheridan’s latest article ‘Dispensing with notice to father’ published by Local Government Lawyer

Daniel Sheridan’s article ‘Dispensing with Notice to Father in Child Protection Proceedings: Navigating the Threshold of…


Nick Goodwin KC and Damian Broadbent in KCC v M & Ors [2026] EWFC 60 (B)

Nick Goodwin KC led Damian Broadbent in KCC v M & Ors [2026] EWFC 60 (B).…

Search

Shortlist close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download