Nick Goodwin KC in X v Y [2025] EWFC 243 (B)


17th Sep 2025 | Cases


Nick Goodwin KC was instructed by Vardags for the respondent father in  X v Y [2025] EWFC 243 (B); private law proceedings concerning internal relocation, child arrangements, and children’s schooling.

This case concerned two children, R (12) and S (11). The mother sought permission to relocate to the Southwest and enrol the children in boarding school, citing improved quality of life. The father opposed boarding and instead proposed a 7/7 shared care arrangement within London.

The ISW opposed the mother’s relocation proposal, warning it would marginalise the father’s role. They recommended a joint “lives with” order, a modest increase in the father’s time, and an equal split of school holidays. 

The children enjoyed shared care and wished to maintain it. Their attachment to both parents was strong. 

At the dispute resolution appointment, the mother withdrew her relocation plan and agreed to London-based schools. The issue for final hearing was whether the children’s care should be divided equally and which schools they should attend.

The court made a joint “lives with” order, equal holiday time, and a 7/7 shared care model. The children will transition to the father’s proposed London-based schools in Year 9. The Court found that these schools best met the children’s needs and were endorsed by the children. 


Related areas


Do you have a similar case?

If you would like some help or advice or to talk to one of our clerks about a matter then please call on 02073536961.

Author

Recent

Frances Harris and Sian Cox’s article ‘Child focused courts and the neurodivergent family’ published in Family Law Journal

Frances Harris and Sian Cox’s article ‘Child focused courts and the neurodivergent family’ published in…


Ashika Singh and Iona McNeill have accepted offers of tenancy with Harcourt Chambers

“I am thrilled to announce that Ashika and Iona will be joining us as tenants…


When a child suffers an unexplained fracture, can suspicious circumstances be enough to prove causation? – Craig Jeakings in G, In the Matter Of [2026] EWFC 227 (B)

In G, In the Matter Of [2026] EWFC 227 (B) the Family Court declined to find that…

Search

Shortlist close
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download